Username


Password

Forgot Password?

Preview

Sign-in free and Explore the Exciting World of BiomedExperts:
  • Over 1.500.000 Profiles
  • More than 1.800 Organizations worldwide
  • State of the Art Network Visualizations
  • Manage your own Profile
  • Locate Experts in your Country/Region
  • Locate Experts in your 1. and 2. Level Network
  • Connect to Experts Worldwide

find experts for

Sign-in to see more
1999: Luca A; García-Pagán J C; de Lacy A M; Escorsell A; Feu F; Visa J; Bosch J; Rodés J
Effects of end-to-side portacaval shunt and distal splenorenal shunt on systemic and pulmonary haemodynamics in patients with cirrhosis.
Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology 1999;14(11):1112-8.
BACKGROUND: Patients with cirrhosis exhibit splanchnic, peripheral and pulmonary vasodilation, which are thought to play a role in increasing portal pressure, promoting sodium retention and determining arterial hypoxaemia. The present study investigated whether these abnormalities are influenced by portal hypertension or by portal systemic shunting. METHODS: Sixty-one patients with cirrhosis who had haemodynamic measurements before and after end-to-side portacaval shunt (n = 30) or distal splenorenal shunt (n = 31) were evaluated. RESULTS: End-to-side portacaval shunts were more effective than distal splenorenal shunts in decompressing the portal system (portocaval pressure gradient 3.2 +/- 2.5 vs splenocaval gradient 6.5 +/- 3.2 mmHg, P < 0.0001), because of a greater shunt blood flow (33 +/- 12 vs 21 +/- 12 mL/min per kg, P < 0.005). Azygos blood flow and hepatic blood flow decreased significantly after both surgical shunts. However, end-to-side portacaval shunts caused a greater decrease in peripheral resistance than distal splenorenal shunts (-23 +/- 18 vs -11+/- 27%, P < 0.05). Mean arterial pressure and pulmonary vascular resistance were significantly reduced after an end-to-side portacaval shunt (-7 +/- 10%, P < 0.001 and -14 +/- 33%, P < 0.004, respectively), but not after splenorenal shunt. CONCLUSIONS: These results show that end-to-side portacaval shunts, despite normalizing portal pressure, worsen the peripheral and pulmonary vasodilatation. The splenorenal shunt that maintained a higher portal pressure, caused less peripheral vasodilatation and did not enhance pulmonary vasodilatation. These findings suggest that portal systemic shunting is more important than increased portal pressure in determining peripheral vasodilatation in cirrhosis.

Post to CiteULike

Sign in free and see...

Visualized networks:
See your personal network in
sophisticated graphical views
GeoTargeted Searches:
Locate experts around the world
and connect with global collaborators
Research Profiles:
See the visualized research activity
of experts around the globe
Sign-in to see more