Username


Password

Forgot Password?

Preview

Sign-in free and Explore the Exciting World of BiomedExperts:
  • Over 1.500.000 Profiles
  • More than 1.800 Organizations worldwide
  • State of the Art Network Visualizations
  • Manage your own Profile
  • Locate Experts in your Country/Region
  • Locate Experts in your 1. and 2. Level Network
  • Connect to Experts Worldwide

find experts for

Sign-in to see more
2003: Hahm Byoung-Kwon; Maldonado Yadilka; Schreiber Edgar; Bhunia Arun K; Nakatsu Cindy H
Subtyping of foodborne and environmental isolates of Escherichia coli by multiplex-PCR, rep-PCR, PFGE, ribotyping and AFLP.
Journal of microbiological methods 2003;53(3):387-99.
A total of 54 isolates were characterized by multiplex-PCR for toxin genes and genotyped using several DNA fingerprinting methods: using repetitive extragenic palindromes (REP) and Box primers (rep-PCR), amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP), pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) and ribotyping. The known-pathogenic strains tested were from food and clinical samples (34 strains) and included serovars O157:H7, O111:H8, O111:H11, O91:H21 and O55:H7. Two type cultures, Escherichia coli K12 (ATCC 29425) and DUP-101 (ATCC 51739), were included as known non-pathogenic strains and an additional 17 previously unclassified isolates from animal fecal samples. Comparisons of genomic DNA fingerprint patterns using unweighted pair group method with arithmetic averages (UPGMA) cluster analysis of Jaccard similarity indices indicated that all methods tested showed a greater similarity between the E. coli O157:H7 strains than to other isolates. On the basis of these studies, we propose that AFLP, REP-PCR, Box-PCR and ribotyping techniques can all be used for discriminating O157:H7 isolates and are preferred for large-scale screening because of the speed and ease of the methods. The PFGE method is the best to discriminate between subtypes of O157:H7 associated with specific outbreak investigations; however, it is more time consuming and unnecessary if subtyping is not required. There are differences between the dendrograms generated from each method and the relationship between the other strains analyzed. However, the fingerprint profiles of the O157:H7 isolates were virtually identical using REP-PCR and Box-PCR enabling easy distinction of the group. Thus, these typing methods have the potential to aid investigators in identifying the source of an outbreak to prevent or control further spread of E. coli O157:H7.

Post to CiteULike

Sign in free and see...

Visualized networks:
See your personal network in
sophisticated graphical views
GeoTargeted Searches:
Locate experts around the world
and connect with global collaborators
Research Profiles:
See the visualized research activity
of experts around the globe
Sign-in to see more