Username


Password

Forgot Password?

Preview

Sign-in free and Explore the Exciting World of BiomedExperts:
  • Over 1.500.000 Profiles
  • More than 1.800 Organizations worldwide
  • State of the Art Network Visualizations
  • Manage your own Profile
  • Locate Experts in your Country/Region
  • Locate Experts in your 1. and 2. Level Network
  • Connect to Experts Worldwide
2003Wallace F Morgan; Call Jeffrey E; Luchansky John B
Validation of the USDA/ARS package rinse method for recovery of Listeria monocytogenes from naturally contaminated, commercially prepared frankfurters.
Journal of food protection 2003;66(10):1920-3.
The utility of the U.S. Department of Agriculture/Agricultural Research Service (USDA/ARS) package rinse method for recovering Listeria monocytogenes from the surface of contaminated foods was validated in comparison to the standard USDA/Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) product composite enrichment method and two other methods using frankfurters from a lot with a known package prevalence rate of approximately 16% for this pathogen. One hundred packages from this batch of naturally contaminated, commercially prepared frankfurters were examined as follows: (i) the package exudative fluid was removed and tested using the standard USDA/FSIS product composite enrichment method; (ii) approximately 5 to 7 portions of frankfurters were removed to obtain a 25-g composite of meat that was then processed using the standard USDA/FSIS product composite enrichment method: (iii) 50 ml of 0.1% peptone water was added to each package, and the USDA/ARS package rinse method was performed on the remaining contents; and (iv) after removing the rinse fluid, the solid contents remaining in each package were directly enriched using the USDA/FSIS product composite enrichment method. These four methods identified that 7, 6, 15, and 9 of the 100 packages tested positive for the pathogen, respectively. Although no single approach yielded a positive result for every package that tested positive for L. monocytogenes by any one of the four sampling strategies, the USDA/ARS package rinse method was appreciably (P < 0.05) better than either the package exudate enrichment method or the standard USDA/FSIS product composite enrichment method at recovering the bacterium. These findings validate the sensitivity and ease of use of the USDA/ARS package rinse method using naturally contaminated frankfurters and argue strongly for its adoption for routine screening of ready-to-eat products that are prone to surface contamination with undesirable microbes such as L. monocytogenes.

Post to CiteULike

Sign in free and see...

Visualized networks:
See your personal network in
sophisticated graphical views
GeoTargeted Searches:
Locate experts around the world
and connect with global collaborators
Research Profiles:
See the visualized research activity
of experts around the globe
Sign-in to see more