Username


Password

Forgot Password?

Preview

Sign-in free and Explore the Exciting World of BiomedExperts:
  • Over 1.500.000 Profiles
  • More than 1.800 Organizations worldwide
  • State of the Art Network Visualizations
  • Manage your own Profile
  • Locate Experts in your Country/Region
  • Locate Experts in your 1. and 2. Level Network
  • Connect to Experts Worldwide

find experts for

Sign-in to see more
2007: Nightingale Kendra; Bovell Liselle; Grajczyk Ashley; Wiedmann Martin
Combined sigB allelic typing and multiplex PCR provide improved discriminatory power and reliability for Listeria monocytogenes molecular serotyping.
Journal of microbiological methods 2007;68(1):52-9.
Conventional serotyping has traditionally been used to subtype Listeria monocytogenes, but has several limitations, including low discriminatory power and poor reproducibility. Molecular serotyping methods have been developed for L. monocytogenes, but generally show limited discriminatory power and high misclassification rates. We selected 157 Listeria isolates to evaluate a combination of a previously described multiplex PCR assay and sigB allelic typing as an alternative molecular serotyping and subtyping strategy for L. monocytogenes. While the multiplex PCR assay differentiated five L. monocytogenes subtypes (Simpson's Index of Discrimination [SID]=0.78), including classification of the most common disease-associated serotypes (1/2a, 1/2b, 1/2c, and lineage I 4b) into four distinct groups, it misclassified 3.8% of the isolates studied here. sigB allelic typing differentiated 29 subtypes (SID=0.87) and also allowed identification of lineage III L. monocytogenes, which could not be differentiated from the other Listeria spp. by the multiplex PCR assay. sigB allelic typing failed to differentiate serotype 1/2c and 1/2a isolates and one sigB allelic type included serotype 4b and 1/2b isolates. A molecular serotyping approach that combines multiplex PCR and sigB sequence data showed increased discriminatory power (SID=0.91) over either method alone as well as conventional serotyping (SID=0.87) and classifies the four major serotypes (i.e., 1/2a, 1/2b, 1/2c, and 4b) into unique subgroups with a lower misclassification rate as compared to the multiplex PCR assay. This combined approach also differentiates lineage I serotype 4b isolates from the genetically distinct serotype 4b isolates classified into lineage III.

Post to CiteULike

Sign in free and see...

Visualized networks:
See your personal network in
sophisticated graphical views
GeoTargeted Searches:
Locate experts around the world
and connect with global collaborators
Research Profiles:
See the visualized research activity
of experts around the globe
Sign-in to see more