Preview
Sign-in for full Details 
Sign-in free and Explore the Exciting World of BiomedExperts:
- Over 1,800,000 Profiles
- More than 3,500 Organizations worldwide
- State of the Art Network Visualizations
- Manage your own Profile
- Locate Experts in your Country/Region
- Locate Experts in your 1. and 2. Level Network
- Connect to Experts Worldwide
find experts for
Sign-in to see more
2008:
Hampshire Andrew J; Fox Keith R
The effects of local DNA sequence on the interaction of ligands with their preferred binding sites.
Biochimie 2008;
90(
7):.
We have examined the effects of local DNA sequence on the interaction of distamycin, Hoechst 33258, echinomycin, actinomycin and mithramycin with their preferred binding sites using a series of DNA fragments that contain every symmetrical hexanucleotide sequence. In several instances we find that the affinity for the ligands' preferred binding sites is affected by the hexanucleotide context in which they are located. The AT-selective minor groove binding ligand Hoechst 33258 shows a 200-fold difference in binding to the 16 different X(A/T)(4)Y sites; the strongest binding is to AAATTT and the weakest is to (G/C)TTAA(C/G). Although TTAA is generally a poor binding site, ATTAAT is better than TTTAAA and they are both much better than GTTAAC and CTTAAG. Similarly, TTATAA and ATATAT are better binding sites than GTATAC and CTATAG. In contrast, distamycin shows less discrimination between the various X(A/T)(4)Y sites, with a 20-fold difference between the best [(A/T)AATT(T/A)] and worst [GATATC and (G/C)TTAA(C/G)] sites. Although actinomycin binds to GpC it shows little or no interaction with any of the GGCC sites, yet shows only a six-fold variation in affinities for the other XYGCXY sites. Echinomycin binds to CpG yet shows no binding to TTCGAA, TGCGCA and AGCGCT, while the best binding is to AACGTT. The tetranucleotides CCGG and ACGT produce consistently good binding sites, irrespective of the surrounding sequences, while the interaction with TCGA and GCGC is sensitive to the hexanucleotide context. Hexanucleotides with a central GCGC, flanked by A and T are weaker echinomycin sites than those flanked by G and C, especially CGCGCG. The best X(G/C)(4)Y binding sites for mithramycin were located at AGCGCT and GGGCCC, and the worst at CCCGGG and TCCGGA. These footprinting fragments are valuable tools for comparing the binding of ligands to all the potential symmetrical hexanucleotides and provide insights into the effects of local DNA sequence on ligand-DNA interactions.
Post to CiteULike 
Sign in free and see...
Visualized networks:
See your personal network in
sophisticated graphical views
GeoTargeted Searches:
Locate experts around the world
and connect with global collaborators
Research Profiles:
See the visualized research activity
of experts around the globe
Sign-in to see more
