Username


Password

Forgot Password?

Preview

Sign-in free and Explore the Exciting World of BiomedExperts:
  • Over 1.500.000 Profiles
  • More than 1.800 Organizations worldwide
  • State of the Art Network Visualizations
  • Manage your own Profile
  • Locate Experts in your Country/Region
  • Locate Experts in your 1. and 2. Level Network
  • Connect to Experts Worldwide

find experts for

Sign-in to see more
1996: Swaminathan B; Hunter S B; Desmarchelier P M; Gerner-Smidt P; Graves L M; Harlander S; Hubner R; Jacquet C; Pedersen B; Reineccius K; Ridley A; Saunders N A; Webster J A
WHO-sponsored international collaborative study to evaluate methods for subtyping Listeria monocytogenes: restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis using ribotyping and Southern hybridization with two probes derived from L. monocytogenes chromosome.
International journal of food microbiology 1996;32(3):263-78.
Seven laboratories participated in a WHO-sponsored international collaborative study, to evaluate methods for subtyping Listeria monocytogenes, by performing restriction fragment length polymorph sm (RFLP) analysis-based subtyping of an international study set of 80 strains of L. monocytogenes that included 22 epidemiologically related groups. The RFLP analysis was done by Southern hybridization with one of two types of probes found in multiple copies on the chromosome of L. monocytogenes. Six laboratories performed ribotyping. These laboratories used EcoRI enzyme to restrict the L. monocytogenes DNA and ribosomal RNA or DNA as the probe for Southern hybridizations. The seventh laboratory used Ncil to restrict the DNA, and two probes, one randomly cloned and the other containing repeat sequences cloned from L. monocytogenes DNA. The overall discriminating power of ribotyping, as estimated by calculation of Simpson's index of diversity, ranged from 0.83 to 0.88 for the six laboratories. The discriminating power of the combination of two probes used by Laboratory 7 was 0.91. Ribotyping and the cloned probes used by Laboratory 7 discriminated poorly between serotype 4b strains. Neither method identified three atypical strains (identified by other subtyping methods) included in three apparently epidemiologically related groups. Ribotyping did not discriminate between strains of serotypes 4b and 4b(X) in one epidemiologically related group of strains; one cloned probe used by Laboratory 7 discriminated between these strains. Intra-laboratory reproducibilities for the seven laboratories ranged from 80.0 to 100%. as determined by their abilities to correctly identify 11 pairs of duplicate strains included in the study set. Inter-laboratory reproducibilities were generally very good considering that no attempt was made to standardize protocols used by the participants.

Post to CiteULike

Sign in free and see...

Visualized networks:
See your personal network in
sophisticated graphical views
GeoTargeted Searches:
Locate experts around the world
and connect with global collaborators
Research Profiles:
See the visualized research activity
of experts around the globe
Sign-in to see more