Preview
Sign-in for full Details 
Sign-in free and Explore the Exciting World of BiomedExperts:
- Over 1.500.000 Profiles
- More than 1.800 Organizations worldwide
- State of the Art Network Visualizations
- Manage your own Profile
- Locate Experts in your Country/Region
- Locate Experts in your 1. and 2. Level Network
- Connect to Experts Worldwide
NetworkView
Steven Feig
This is a preview profile on BiomedExperts - the first literature-based scientific social network. It brings the right researchers
together and allows them to collaborate online. Collexis and Dell provide the BiomedExperts network of +1.5 Million pre-calculated profiles
free of charge to researchers worldwide.
Research Profile (preview)
Procedures
Disorders
Anatomy
Concepts & Ideas
Sign-in to see full Profile
Network (preview)
7
Patchefsky, Arthur
7
Sickles, Edward
6
Yaffe, Martin
6
Hendrick, Edward
4
Kopans, Daniel
3
Linver, Michael
3
Jackson, Valerie
3
D'Orsi, Carl
3
Pisano, Etta
3
Monsees, Barbara
3
Stelling, CB
2
Walsh, Ruth
2
Muller, Keith
2
Piccoli, Catherine
2
Schwartz, Gordon
Sign-in to see all Coauthors
Publications
Sign-in to see all Publications
Sign in free and see...
Visualized networks:
See your personal network in
sophisticated graphical views
GeoTargeted Searches:
Locate experts around the world
and connect with global collaborators
Research Profiles:
See the visualized research activity
of experts around the globe
Sign-in to see more
Geonetwork of Steven Feig (preview)
Cities where this author has publications
Cities where co-authors of this author have publications
Sign-in to see more
All Publications
-
2009: Agrawal Garima; Su Min-Ying; Nalcioglu Orhan; Feig Stephen A; Chen Jeon-Hor
Significance of breast lesion descriptors in the ACR BI-RADS MRI lexicon.
Cancer 2009;115(7):1363-80.
-
2009: Molloi Sabee; Mehraien Toufan; Iribarren Carlos; Smith Christopher; Ducote Justin L; Feig Stephen A
Reproducibility of breast arterial calcium mass quantification using digital mammography.
Academic radiology 2009;16(3):275-82.
-
2009: Schwartz Gordon F; Hughes Kevin S; Lynch Henry T; Fabian Carol J; Fentiman Ian S; Robson Mark E; Domchek Susan M; Hartmann Lynn C; Holland Roland; Winchester David J; Anderson Benjamin O; Arun Banu K; Bartelink Harry; Bernard Philip; Bonanni Bernardo; Cady Blake; Clough Krishna B; Feig Stephen A; Heywang-Köbrunner Sylvia H; Howell Anthony; Isaacs Claudine; Kopans Daniel B; Mansel Robert E; Masood Shahla; Palazzo Juan P; Pressman Peter I; Solin Lawrence J; Untch Michael
Proceedings of the international consensus conference on breast cancer risk, genetics, & risk management, April, 2007.
The breast journal 2009;15(1):4-16.
-
2008: Simpson William L; Hermann George; Rausch Dana R; Sherman Joshua; Feig Stephen A; Bleiweiss Ira J; Jaffer Shabnam; Port Abraham
Ultrasound detection of nonpalpable mammographically occult malignancy.
Canadian Association of Radiologists journal = Journal l'Association canadienne des radiologistes 2008;59(2):70-6.
-
2007: Feig Stephen A
Auditing and benchmarks in screening and diagnostic mammography.
Radiologic clinics of North America 2007;45(5):791-800, vi.
-
2007: Feig Stephen A; Birdwell Robyn L; Linver Michael N
Computer-aided screening mammography.
The New England journal of medicine 2007;357(1):84; author reply 85.
-
2006: Feig Stephen A
Screening mammography: a successful public health initiative.
Revista panamericana de salud pública = Pan American journal of public health 2006;20(2-3):125-33.
-
2005: Feig Stephen A
Screening mammography controversies: resolved, partly resolved, and unresolved.
The breast journal 2005;11 Suppl 1():S3-6.
-
2004: Feig Stephen A
Adverse effects of screening mammography.
Radiologic clinics of North America 2004;42(5):807-19, v.
-
2004: Feig Stephen A; Sickles Edward A; Evans W Phil; Linver Michael N
Re: Changes in breast cancer detection and mammography recall rates after the introduction of a computer-aided detection system.
Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2004;96(16):1260-1; author reply 1261.
-
2003: Cole Elodia B; Pisano Etta D; Kistner Emily O; Muller Keith E; Brown Marylee E; Feig Stephen A; Jong Roberta A; Maidment Andrew D A; Staiger Melinda J; Kuzmiak Cherie M; Freimanis Rita I; Lesko Nadine; Rosen Eric L; Walsh Ruth; Williford Margaret; Braeuning M Patricia
Diagnostic accuracy of digital mammography in patients with dense breasts who underwent problem-solving mammography: effects of image processing and lesion type.
Radiology 2003;226(1):153-60.
-
2003: Feig Stephen A
How reliable is the evidence for screening mammography?
Recent results in cancer research. Fortschritte der Krebsforschung. Progrès dans les recherches sur le cancer 2003;163():129-39; discussion 264-6.
-
2002: Feig Stephen A
Effect of service screening mammography on population mortality from breast carcinoma.
Cancer 2002;95(3):451-7.
-
2002: Feig Stephen A
Breast cancer screening: potential role of computer-aided detection (CAD).
Technology in cancer research & treatment 2002;1(2):127-31.
-
2002: Feig Stephen A
Image quality of screening mammography: effect on clinical outcome.
AJR. American journal of roentgenology 2002;178(4):805-7.
-
2002: Schwartz Gordon Francis; Feig Stephen A
Nonpalpable breast lesions: biopsy methods and patient management.
Obstetrics and gynecology clinics of North America 2002;29(1):137-57.
-
2002: Feig Stephen A
Current status of screening mammography.
Obstetrics and gynecology clinics of North America 2002;29(1):123-36.
-
2001: Haus A G; Yaffe M J; Feig S A; Hendrick R E; Butler P A; Wilcox P A; Bansal S
Relationship between phantom failure rates and radiation dose in mammography accreditation.
Medical physics 2001;28(11):2297-301.
-
2000: Pisano E D; Cole E B; Major S; Zong S; Hemminger B M; Muller K E; Johnston R E; Walsh R; Conant E; Fajardo L L; Feig S A; Nishikawa R M; Yaffe M J; Williams M B; Aylward S R
Radiologists' preferences for digital mammographic display. The International Digital Mammography Development Group.
Radiology 2000;216(3):820-30.
-
2000: Feig S A; Hall F M; Ikeda D M; Mendelson E B; Rubin E C; Segel M C; Watson A B; Eklund G W; Stelling C B; Jackson V P
Society of Breast Imaging residency and fellowship training curriculum.
Radiologic clinics of North America 2000;38(4):915-20, xi.
-
2000: Feig S A
Economic challenges in breast imaging. A survivor's guide to success.
Radiologic clinics of North America 2000;38(4):843-52.
-
2000: Feig S A
Ductal carcinoma in situ. Implications for screening mammography.
Radiologic clinics of North America 2000;38(4):653-68, vii.
-
2000: Warren Burhenne L J; Wood S A; D'Orsi C J; Feig S A; Kopans D B; O'Shaughnessy K F; Sickles E A; Tabar L; Vyborny C J; Castellino R A
Potential contribution of computer-aided detection to the sensitivity of screening mammography.
Radiology 2000;215(2):554-62.
-
2000: Pisano E D; Yaffe M J; Hemminger B M; Hendrick R E; Niklason L T; Maidment A D; Kimme-Smith C M; Feig S A; Sickles E A; Braeuning M P
Current status of full-field digital mammography.
Academic radiology 2000;7(4):266-80.
-
2000: Feig S A
Age-related accuracy of screening mammography: how should it be measured?
Radiology 2000;214(3):633-40.
-
1999: Piccoli C W; Feig S A; Palazzo J P
Developing asymmetric breast tissue.
Radiology 1999;211(1):111-7.
-
1999: Bassett L W; Cardenosa G; D'Orsi C J; Dempsey P J; Dershaw D D; Destouet J M; Evans W P; Feig S A; Hendrick R E; Jackson V P; Kopans D B; Linver M N; Mendelson E B; Monsees B; Racenstein M J; Sickles E A; Stelling C B; Warren L
Risk of risk-based mammography screening, ages 40 to 49. American College of Radiology Task Force on Breast Cancer.
Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology 1999;17(2):735-8.
-
1999: Feig S A
Role and evaluation of mammography and other imaging methods for breast cancer detection, diagnosis, and staging.
Seminars in nuclear medicine 1999;29(1):3-15.
-
1998: Rovno H D; Feig S A; Hughes J S; Hurford M T; Karasick D; Filippone E
Breast imaging case of the day. Spontaneously disappearing benign calcifications of the breast.
Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc 1998;18(6):1599-604.
-
1998: Wilkes A N; Feig S A; Palazzo J P
Breast imaging case of the day. Intracystic papillary carcinoma of the breast.
Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc 1998;18(5):1310-3.
-
1998: Feig S A; Kopans D B; Sickles E A; Jackson V P; Monsees B
Rationale for annual screening mammography for women ages 40-49 years.
Breast disease 1998;10(3-4):13-21.
-
1998: Kopans D B; Feig S A
False positive rate of screening mammography.
The New England journal of medicine 1998;339(8):562-4.
-
1998: Whitfill C H; Feig S A; Webner D
Breast imaging case of the day. Secondary non-Hodgkin (low-grade B-cell follicular small cleaved cell type) lymphoma of the breast.
Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc 1998;18(4):1038-42.
-
1998: Feig S A; Yaffe M J
Digital mammography.
Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc 1998;18(4):893-901.
-
1998: Feig S A; D'Orsi C J; Hendrick R E; Jackson V P; Kopans D B; Monsees B; Sickles E A; Stelling C B; Zinninger M; Wilcox-Buchalla P
American College of Radiology guidelines for breast cancer screening.
AJR. American journal of roentgenology 1998;171(1):29-33.
-
1998: Piccoli C W; Feig S A; Vala M A
Breast imaging case of the day. Benign intraductal papilloma with focal atypical papillomatous hyperplasia.
Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc 1998;18(3):783-6.
-
1998: Murphy T J; Mowad C M; Feig S A; Nussbaum S A; Hyland J C
Breast imaging case of the day. Dermatopathic lymphadenopathy.
Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc 1998;18(2):536-9.
-
1998: Nussbaum S A; Feig S A; Capuzzi D M
Breast imaging case of the day. Fibroadenoma with microcalcification.
Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc 1998;18(1):243-5.
-
1997: Feig S A
Increased benefit from shorter screening mammography intervals for women ages 40-49 years.
Cancer 1997;80(11):2035-9.
-
1997: Feig S A; Hendrick R E
Radiation risk from screening mammography of women aged 40-49 years.
Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs 1997;(22):119-24.
-
1996: Feig S A
Methods to identify benefit from mammographic screening of women aged 40-49 years.
Radiology 1996;201(2):309-16.
-
1996: Feig S A; Yaffe M J
Current status of digital mammography.
Seminars in ultrasound, CT, and MR 1996;17(5):424-43.
-
1996: Feig S A
Mammographic screening of elderly women.
JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association 1996;276(6):446.
-
1996: Feig S A
Strategies for improving sensitivity of screening mammography for women aged 40 to 49 years.
JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association 1996;276(1):73-4.
-
1996: Feig S A
Assessment of radiation risk from screening mammography.
Cancer 1996;77(5):818-22.
-
1996: Kopans D B; Feig S A; Sickles E A
Malignant breast masses detected only by ultrasound: a retrospective review.
Cancer 1996;77(1):208-9.
-
1995: Feig S A
Mammographic screening of women aged 40-49 years. Benefit, risk, and cost considerations.
Cancer 1995;76(10 Suppl):2097-106.
-
1995: Feig S A; Yaffe M J
Digital mammography, computer-aided diagnosis, and telemammography.
Radiologic clinics of North America 1995;33(6):1205-30.
-
1995: Murphy T J; Conant E F; Hanau C A; Ehrlich S M; Feig S A
Bilateral breast carcinoma: mammographic and histologic correlation.
Radiology 1995;195(3):617-21.
-
1995: Feig S A
Estimation of currently attainable benefit from mammographic screening of women aged 40-49 years.
Cancer 1995;75(10):2412-9.
-
1995: Feig S A
A 26-year-old woman is referred for mammography by her gynecologist for evaluation of bilateral breast tenderness.
AJR. American journal of roentgenology 1995;164(5):1292-3.
-
1994: Schwartz G F; Feig S A
Management of clinically occult (nonpalpable) breast lesions.
Obstetrics and gynecology clinics of North America 1994;21(4):621-37.
-
1994: Feig S A
Mammographic screening of women aged 40 to 49 years. Is it justified?
Obstetrics and gynecology clinics of North America 1994;21(4):587-606.
-
1994: Feig S A
Determination of mammographic screening intervals with surrogate measures for women aged 40-49 years.
Radiology 1994;193(2):311-4.
-
1994: Conant E F; Dillon R L; Palazzo J; Ehrlich S M; Feig S A
Imaging findings in mucin-containing carcinomas of the breast: correlation with pathologic features.
AJR. American journal of roentgenology 1994;163(4):821-4.
-
1994: Lev-Toaff A S; Feig S A; Saitas V L; Finkel G C; Schwartz G F
Stability of malignant breast microcalcifications.
Radiology 1994;192(1):153-6.
-
1994: Schwartz G F; Carter D L; Conant E F; Gannon F H; Finkel G C; Feig S A
Mammographically detected breast cancer. Nonpalpable is not a synonym for inconsequential.
Cancer 1994;73(6):1660-5.
-
1994: Feig S A
Hormonal reduction of mammographic densities: potential effects on breast cancer risk and performance of diagnostic and screening mammography.
Journal of the National Cancer Institute 1994;86(6):408-9.
-
1993: Kopans D B; Feig S A
The Canadian National Breast Screening Study: a critical review.
AJR. American journal of roentgenology 1993;161(4):755-60.
-
1993: Jackson V P; Hendrick R E; Feig S A; Kopans D B
Imaging of the radiographically dense breast.
Radiology 1993;188(2):297-301.
-
1993: Feig S A
Mammographic screening: an historical perspective.
Seminars in roentgenology 1993;28(3):193-203.
-
1993: Conant E F; Wilkes A N; Mendelson E B; Feig S A
Superficial thrombophlebitis of the breast (Mondor's disease): mammographic findings.
AJR. American journal of roentgenology 1993;160(6):1201-3.
-
1993: Feig S A; Hendrick R E
Mammography's upside outweighs possible risks.
Diagnostic imaging 1993;15(3):121-5, 128, 141.
-
1992: Feig S A
Breast masses. Mammographic and sonographic evaluation.
Radiologic clinics of North America 1992;30(1):67-92.
-
1991: Schwartz G F; Feig S A
Management of patients with nonpalpable breast lesions.
Oncology (Williston Park, N.Y.) 1991;5(10):39-44; discussion 47-8, 50.
-
1990: Feig S A; Ehrlich S M
Estimation of radiation risk from screening mammography: recent trends and comparison with expected benefits.
Radiology 1990;174(3 Pt 1):638-47.
-
1990: Feig S A; Galkin B M; Muir H D
Evaluation and comparison of mammographic quality at facilities participating in a regional breast cancer awareness program.
Recent results in cancer research. Fortschritte der Krebsforschung. Progrès dans les recherches sur le cancer 1990;119():65-74.
-
1990: Feig S A
Follow-up studies of the health insurance plan study and the breast cancer detection demonstration project screening trials in the USA.
Recent results in cancer research. Fortschritte der Krebsforschung. Progrès dans les recherches sur le cancer 1990;119():39-52.
-
1990: Feig S A
Should breast self-examination be included in a mammographic screening program?
Recent results in cancer research. Fortschritte der Krebsforschung. Progrès dans les recherches sur le cancer 1990;119():151-64.
-
1990: Feig S A
A new method for assessment of radiation risk from screening mammography.
Recent results in cancer research. Fortschritte der Krebsforschung. Progrès dans les recherches sur le cancer 1990;119():141-50.
-
1989: Feig S A
The role of ultrasound in a breast imaging center.
Seminars in ultrasound, CT, and MR 1989;10(2):90-105.
-
1989: Patchefsky A S; Schwartz G F; Finkelstein S D; Prestipino A; Sohn S E; Singer J S; Feig S A
Heterogeneity of intraductal carcinoma of the breast.
Cancer 1989;63(4):731-41.
-
1989: Schwartz G F; Patchefsky A S; Finklestein S D; Sohn S H; Prestipino A; Feig S A; Singer J S
Nonpalpable in situ ductal carcinoma of the breast. Predictors of multicentricity and microinvasion and implications for treatment.
Archives of surgery (Chicago, Ill. : 1960) 1989;124(1):29-32.
-
1988: Feig S A
The importance of supplementary mammographic views to diagnostic accuracy.
AJR. American journal of roentgenology 1988;151(1):40-1.
-
1988: Feig S A
Decreased breast cancer mortality through mammographic screening: results of clinical trials.
Radiology 1988;167(3):659-65.
-
1988: Davis P S; Wechsler R J; Feig S A; March D E
Migration of breast biopsy localization wire.
AJR. American journal of roentgenology 1988;150(4):787-8.
-
1988: Milner S H; Feig S A; McArdle G H
A successful breast imaging center. Design to reality.
Administrative radiology : AR 1988;7(3):35-8.
-
1988: Galkin B M; Feig S A; Muir H D
The technical quality of mammography in centers participating in a regional breast cancer awareness program.
Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc 1988;8(1):133-45.
-
1988: Schwartz G F; Feig S A; Patchefsky A S
Significance and staging of nonpalpable carcinomas of the breast.
Surgery, gynecology & obstetrics 1988;166(1):6-10.
-
1987: Feig S A
Mammography equipment: principles, features, selection.
Radiologic clinics of North America 1987;25(5):897-911.
-
1987: Miller C L; Feig S A; Fox J W
Mammographic changes after reduction mammoplasty.
AJR. American journal of roentgenology 1987;149(1):35-8.
-
1987: Rosenberg A L; Schwartz G F; Feig S A; Patchefsky A S
Clinically occult breast lesions: localization and significance.
Radiology 1987;162(1 Pt 1):167-70.
-
1987: Galkin B M; Feig S A; Patchefsky A S; Muir H D
Elemental analysis of breast calcifications.
Recent results in cancer research. Fortschritte der Krebsforschung. Progrès dans les recherches sur le cancer 1987;105():89-94.
-
1987: Feig S A
Mammography screening: published guidelines and actual practice.
Recent results in cancer research. Fortschritte der Krebsforschung. Progrès dans les recherches sur le cancer 1987;105():78-84.
-
1987: Galkin B M; Feig S A; Frasca P; Muir H D; Soriano R Z
Imaging capabilities and dose considerations of different mammographic units.
Recent results in cancer research. Fortschritte der Krebsforschung. Progrès dans les recherches sur le cancer 1987;105():25-30.
-
1987: Feig S A; Galkin B M; Muir H D
Clinical considerations in selection of dedicated mammography units.
Recent results in cancer research. Fortschritte der Krebsforschung. Progrès dans les recherches sur le cancer 1987;105():15-8.
-
1987: Feig S A; Galkin B M; Muir H D
Evaluation of breast microcalcifications by means of optically magnified tissue specimen radiographs.
Recent results in cancer research. Fortschritte der Krebsforschung. Progrès dans les recherches sur le cancer 1987;105():111-23.
-
1987: Feig S A
Imaging techniques and guidelines for evaluation and follow-up of breast cancer patients.
Critical reviews in diagnostic imaging 1987;27(1):1-16.
-
1987: Feig S A
Projected benefits and risks from mammographic screening.
Recent results in cancer research. Fortschritte der Krebsforschung. Progrès dans les recherches sur le cancer 1987;105():85-8.
-
1986: Feig S A
The role of new imaging modalities in staging and follow-up of breast cancer.
Seminars in oncology 1986;13(4):402-14.
-
1984: Schwartz G F; Rosenberg A L; Danoff B F; Mansfield C M; Feig S A
Lumpectomy and level I axillary dissection prior to irradiation for "operable" breast cancer.
Annals of surgery 1984;200(4):554-60.
-
1984: Feig S A
Radiation risk from mammography: is it clinically significant?
AJR. American journal of roentgenology 1984;143(3):469-75.
-
1984: Schwartz G F; Feig S A; Rosenberg A L; Patchefsky A S; Schwartz A B
Staging and treatment of clinically occult breast cancer.
Cancer 1984;53(6):1379-84.
-
1984: Feig S A
Validity of mammographic screening: pros and cons.
Cancer investigation 1984;2(2):177-9.
-
1984: Moskowitz M; Feig S A; Cole-Beuglet C; Fox S H; Haberman J D; Libshitz H I; Zermeno A
Evaluation of new imaging procedures for breast cancer.
Recent results in cancer research. Fortschritte der Krebsforschung. Progrès dans les recherches sur le cancer 1984;90():55-61.
-
1984: Feig S A; Schwartz G F
Prognostic pathologic factors among breast cancers detected on screening by mammography.
Recent results in cancer research. Fortschritte der Krebsforschung. Progrès dans les recherches sur le cancer 1984;90():148-60.
-
1984: Schwartz G F; Danoff B F; Feig S A; Rosenblum H M; Bloss J D; Gall J R
The selective treatment of "early" carcinoma of the breast by lumpectomy, level I axillary dissection, and radiation therapy.
Recent results in cancer research. Fortschritte der Krebsforschung. Progrès dans les recherches sur le cancer 1984;90():133-40.
-
1984: Schwartz G F; Feig S A; Rosenberg A L; Patchefsky A S; Shaber G S
Localization and significance of clinically occult breast lesions: experience with 469 needle-guided biopsies.
Recent results in cancer research. Fortschritte der Krebsforschung. Progrès dans les recherches sur le cancer 1984;90():125-32.
-
1984: Feig S A
Benefits and risks of mammography.
Recent results in cancer research. Fortschritte der Krebsforschung. Progrès dans les recherches sur le cancer 1984;90():11-27.
-
1984: Feig S A
Hypothetical breast cancer risk from mammography.
Recent results in cancer research. Fortschritte der Krebsforschung. Progrès dans les recherches sur le cancer 1984;90():1-10.
-
1983: Myers L E; McLelland R; Stricker C X; Feig S A; Martin J E; Moskowitz M; Nielsen M E
Reproducibility of mammographic classifications.
AJR. American journal of roentgenology 1983;141(3):445-50.
-
1983: Feig S A
Localization of clinically occult breast lesions.
Radiologic clinics of North America 1983;21(1):155-71.
-
1983: Feig S A
Assessment of the hypothetical risk from mammography and evaluation of the potential benefit.
Radiologic clinics of North America 1983;21(1):173-91.
-
1982: Galkin B M; Frasca P; Feig S A; Holderness K E
Non-calcified breast particles: a possible new marker of breast cancer.
Investigative radiology 1982;17(2):119-28.
-
1982: Frasca P; Galkin B; Feig S; Muir H; Soriano R; Kaufman H
A new method of magnifying photographic images using the scanning electron microscope in the backscattered electron detection mode.
Scanning electron microscopy 1982;(Pt 3):917-23.
-
1980: Schwartz G F; Patchesfsky A S; Feig S A; Shaber G S; Schwartz A B
Multicentricity of non-palpable breast cancer.
Cancer 1980;45(12):2913-6.
-
1980: Schwartz G F; Patchefsky A S; Feig S A; Shaber G S; Schwartz A B
Clinically occult breast cancer. Multicentricity and implications for treatment.
Annals of surgery 1980;191(1):8-12.
-
1979: Feig S A
Low-dose mammography. Application to medical practice.
JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association 1979;242(19):2107-9.
-
1978: Schwartz G F; Shaber G S; Feig S A; Patchefsky A S; Nerlinger R E; Franco J; Wallace J D
Mass screening for breast cancer: current concepts.
American journal of obstetrics and gynecology 1978;130(3):359-60.
-
1977: Feig S A; Shaber G S; Patchefsky A; Schwartz G F; Edeiken J; Libshitz H I; Nerlinger R; Curley R F; Wallace J D
Analysis of clinically occult and mammographically occult breast tumors.
AJR. American journal of roentgenology 1977;128(3):403-8.
-
1977: Feig S A; Wallace J D
Thermography in breast cancer screening: progress and prospects.
Medical instrumentation 1977;11(1):21-5.
-
1977: Feig S A; Shaber G S; Schwartz G F; Patchefsky A; Libshitz H I; Edeiken J; Nerlinger R; Curley R F; Wallace J D
Thermography, mammography, and clinical examination in breast cancer screening. Review of 16,000 studies.
Radiology 1977;122(1):123-7.
-
1976: Libshitz H I; Feig S A; Fetouh S
Needle localization of nonpalpable breast lesions.
Radiology 1976;121(3 Pt. 1):557-60.
-
1976: Schwartz G F; Feig S A; Libshitz H I; Patchefsky A S; Nerlinger R E; Wallace J D
Mass screening for breast disease. Results, problems, and expectations.
Obstetrics and gynecology 1976;48(2):137-41.
Sign-in to see more